🔗 Share this article

Throughout last year's race for the White House, the former president wooed the electorate with promises to reduce costs immediately upon taking office. But, once he assumed office, he seemed to pay precious little attention to affordability issues. All that changed after inflation-weary citizens expressed dissatisfaction at the polls. Within days, his team launched a hastily assembled campaign to address living costs. Regrettably, the drive has proven a hot mess—characterized by absurdity, inconsistencies, magical thinking, scapegoating, and misleading statements.

Detached Assertions and Grocery Store Reality

Just two days after the election, the president kicked off his affordability drive with a poorly received remark: “Our groceries are way down. Everything is way down… So I don’t want to hear about the cost of living.” These words from the wealthy leader—who frequently associates with fellow billionaires—demonstrated utter contempt for everyday citizens facing difficulties every time they go supermarkets. In effect, he ignored their struggles as trivial, implying they were mistaken about price levels.

His assertion about declining prices was absurdly obtuse and dishonest. In what way could every price be falling when the taxes he imposed were increasing prices? Official statistics indicate banana prices rose 6.9% over the past year, beef prices climbed almost 15%, and the cost of coffee jumped by nearly 19%—in part because of punitive tariffs applied to Brazilian products. In the first three quarters, costs increased in the majority of food categories monitored by the government’s price index, including meats, poultry, and fish (up 4.5%), non-alcoholic beverages (up 2.8%), and produce (up 1.3%).

Inconsistencies and Falsehoods in Financial Statements

In spite of the evidence, Trump persists in repeating his big lie about affordability. Since election day, he has stated there is “almost no price increases,” declared “costs have fallen significantly,” and argued “living is cheaper under Trump than it was under his predecessor.” Such remarks ignore the fact that prices overall have clearly increased after the previous administration. Currently, inflation is at a 3 percent per year, which is 50% higher than the central bank’s target of 2 percent. In another falsehood, he boasted that fuel costs had fallen to nearly $2 a gallon, despite official data indicate they are over three dollars.

Faced with actual conditions and declining opinion polls, advisers apparently cautioned that his “costs are falling” rhetoric portrayed him as disconnected from ordinary people. A lot of citizens are angry about prices continuing to climb following assurances of reductions. As a result, advisers proposed one quick fix: roll back some of Trump’s beloved tariffs. The logical move clashed with Trump’s absurd assertion that additional taxes would not increase costs for US consumers.

Proposed Fixes and Their Potential Impact

With certain taxes reduced on several food items, Trump will likely claim that he has lowered costs once those foods begin to fall in price. This would be like an arsonist boasting for extinguishing a fire that he had started. In another instance, when addressing McDonald’s executives, Trump stated that “we are in the golden age of America” and assured the audience that “prices are coming down and all of that stuff.” Such statements are easy for a billionaire to make, but seem insincere to millions of Americans who are struggling—especially when millions risk cuts to nutrition assistance or rising insurance costs.

According to a recent poll conducted last fall, three-quarters of respondents believe economic conditions are fair or poor, while only 26% rate them positive. A separate survey found that 61% of Americans say the administration’s actions have “made the economy worse” in the country.

Economic Truth and Proposed Steps

The treasury secretary, Trump’s top economic official, recently disputed assertions of a prosperous era. He stated that far from booming, certain sectors of the American economy “have contracted.” Industrial production—which Trump vowed to save—seems to have shrunk for multiple consecutive months and shed around 33,000 jobs since January. Pointing to these challenges, Bessent called on the Federal Reserve to reduce borrowing costs—an action that could ease financial pressure.

In response to widespread concern about affordability, the president proposed a direct payment of “a payout of at least $2,000 a person” excluding “the wealthy.” For many households in need, this sounds like a financial lifeline, but it is unlikely that Congress—already alarmed about large shortfalls—will approve the proposal. The scheme could raise government expenditure, increase borrowing costs, and possibly drive prices higher by putting more money into consumers’ pockets.

Another supposed fix for cost issues centered on creating half-century home loans, with the notion that they could lower housing costs. But, the truth is that such lengthy loans would do little to reduce installments—often cutting them by a small amount each month. The downside is that these loans could significantly increase the total interest homeowners pay and hinder their accumulation of equity.

Blaming the Past Government and Economic Outlook

As part of their affordability campaign, the administration have again pointed fingers at the previous president for financial challenges, such as rising prices. Officials claimed they “inherited a disaster from Joe Biden” and were “addressing Biden’s inflation.” These are absurd and inaccurate claims. Actually, Biden handed over a strong economy, with low price growth, solid expansion, and minimal joblessness. But, the current administration’s actions—especially import taxes—have created an difficult situation, driving costs higher and slowing GDP growth.

According to an economist, lead analyst at Moody’s Analytics, numerous regions are already in recession, with their economies damaged by Trump’s tariffs. Zandi worries that if key regions like major economies enter a downturn, the US could slide into a broad economic slump. In downturns, consumers typically have reduced funds to spend, and price increases usually declines. Sadly, given the highly-touted affordability campaign likely to do little to control costs, his most effective “tool” for achieving increased affordability might end up triggering an economic contraction—something that struggling Americans cannot handle.